Showing posts with label Sean Connery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sean Connery. Show all posts

Thursday, July 25, 2013

Finding Forrester

Finding Forrester (PG-13)
Grade: B+
  • Directed by: Gus Vant Sant
  • Produced by: Sean Connery and Laurence Mark
  • Screenplay by: Mike Rich
  • Starring: Sean Connery (William Forrester), Rob Brown (Jamal Wallace), F. Murray Abraham (Professor Robert Crawford), Anna Paquin (Claire), Busta Rhymes (Terrel), April Grace (Ms. Joyce)
  • Cinematographer: Harris Savides
  • Distributed by: Columbia Pictures
  • Released: December 19, 2000
  • Running Time: 136 minutes/2 hours and 16 minutes
  • Language: English

 "Not exactly a soup question, now is it?"
-Jamal Wallace

To some, writing may just be words on a page, but to others who take it seriously, it's much more than that.  Writing can be the key to a person's future or their escape, which is the case with Jamal Wallace, the main character in the film "Finding Forrester".  The film may be simple with its presentation, and the plot may be something we've all seen before, but it's still touching for me, as an aspiring writer who has never been able to fit in with my surroundings well.

"Finding Forrester" begins with 16 year old Jamal Wallace being awakened by his mother to go play basketball with the friends he's grown up with his whole life.  He's so good that he breaks his friend's ankles on a daily basis.  But that's not the only thing that happens daily.  Jamal and his friends are constantly watched by a presence called "The Window' from an upstairs apartment.  No one knows who he is, but there are crazy stories going around about him.  Jamal's friends are scared, but he isn't, so he's dared to break into the apartment.  Problem is, that "The Window" finds him, and chases him off, causing Jamal to run and leave his book bag.  When he gets it back, we find out that he's really a writer at heart, not a baller, and "The Window" has more of a reputation than what Jamal's friend's say.  What happens from there helps jump start the film.   

The film's strength starts with the chemistry of the cast.  Sean Connery is a master and pro, but he gets along so well with newcomer Rob Brown, which I found particularly surprising, since I've seen so many young actors struggle with well-known actors, but Brown held up his demeanor well with Connery, and all the other cast members.  The film, with a mentor-student plot, is something familiar, especially when talking about Gus Vant Sant, but for me, it's reassuring since very few films like this can be made now without it being stale. 

Although I have my praise, there are a few minor things I thought took away from the film.  I liked most of the characters, but there were some, such as Claire that I thought served no purpose.  Sure, she's supposed to be the love interest of Jamal, but their time together is never expanded on, which I wanted to see out of her and other characters.  Also, the film felt like it dragged on, which may help for a film like this, but for someone who isn't patient, 136 minutes is a lot to ask for.  Lastly, I thought this film reminded me too much of "Good Will Hunting", which isn't a bad thing, but if you're director Gus Vant Sant, you should try to make two of your films as completely different as possible.  Otherwise, that seems like lazy film-making. 

In the end, "Finding Forrester" has more cons than pros, which may have you on the fence of seeing this film or not.  To me though, you should see this film because it accurately depicts life.  I'm not talking about how it depicts urban life.  I'm talking about how it shows the struggle young people have making decisions in life.  Whether or not they should leave their friends for a better life or whether or not they should follow their dreams?  These are all problems we must deal with eventually, and I think this film gives an honest depiction with it.  Along with that, since I'm an aspiring writer, it's nice to see a film about us that makes us seem human for once.  Everyone sometimes thinks writers are special people, but we're regular people just like everyone else trying to make it in the world.  We just talk and write more.  

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

Dr. No

Dr. No (PG)
Grade: A-
  • Directed by: Terence Young
  • Produced by: Harry Saltzman and Albert R. Broccoli
  • Screenplay by: Richard Maibaum, Johanna Harwood, and Berkley Mather.  Based on Dr. No by Ian Fleming
  • Starring: Sean Connery (James Bond), Ursula Andress (Honey Ryder), Joseph Wiseman (Dr. No), Jack Lord (Felix Leiter), Bernard Lee (M), Anthony Dawson (Professor Dent), John Kitzmiller (Quarrel), Zena Marshall (Miss Taro), Eunice Gayson (Sylvia Trench), Lois Maxwell (Miss Moneypenny) 
  • Cinematographer: Ted Moore
  • Music by: Monty Norman
  • Studio: Eon Productions
  • Distributed by: United Artists
  • Released: October 5, 1962
  • Running Time: 109 minutes/1 hour and 49 minutes
  • Language: English

"Bond...James Bond"
-James Bond

The first time I remember being exposed to James Bond 007, was when I was a child reading Ian Fleming's novels.  My dad had a huge volume of his works, so I read them all at school, or whenever I had spare time.  I didn't understand anything since the dialogue was too intricate for my young mind, but after being exposed to James Bond, I knew I would never forget the name.  Then one Saturday night, out of nowhere, I saw "Dr. No" on ABC.  I was confused because the film was nothing like I pictured it, but I watched it anyways, starting a love affair that still continues to this day.
  
"Dr. No" starts off with a British Intelligence Station Chief named Strangways, who gets ambushed and killed in Jamaica.  After British Secret Service gets news of this, they send their best Agent, James Bond 007, to Jamaica to investigate what happened.  He doesn't find much at first, but with clever tactics, he finds that everything leads to Crab Key and the mysterious Dr. No. 

I realize that I didn't say much about the plot, but that's only because not much happens in the "Dr. No".  I know that seems hard to believe, considering what all the recent Bond films have been like, but that's really the case.  It's the first film, so it's likely the filmmakers were just trying to get a feel for the series, and the Bond formula we're all so accustomed too.  Despite being unlike modern Bond films, there is a car chase, fight scene, and beautiful women, including the beautiful Ursula Andress as Honey Ryder.

The star of the film though is Sean Connery.  No doubt, we all know what a great actor he is now, but back then, he was basically unknown besides a few roles.  In fact, he was so unlike Ian Fleming's depiction of Bond, that he was almost passed over until fate changed things.  Everyone has their own preference of Bond, but true fans will always know Connery is the best.  He's sexy, suave, smooth, charming, but at the same time, you know he's knowledgeable and can kick your ass.  Not to mention, his dialogue and accent play well to the character, and he has unbelievable chemistry with everyone in the cast as they'll tell you.  "Dr. No" has some memorable moments, but none more memorable than this one (which reminds me of how Alfred Hitchcock introduces characters in some of his films).

The immortal introduction and soundtrack

So overall, "Dr. No" is a good Bond film.  Not great compared to "From Russia With Love" or "Goldfinger" because the villain doesn't appear much in the film (among some other small flaws), but it's a good introduction to the franchise.  I know some of you are wondering why I gave such a high grade to a "good" film, but my answer is because of the way the film made me feel then, and how it makes me feel now.  After seeing "Dr. No" as a child, I was obsessed with Bond to the point that I played James Bond at the playground more than tag.  Because I'm older, I'm not as addicted to Bond as I was then, but I still love it, and wish I could be him (or at least Sean Connery for that matter).  I know that's impossible, but I can still dream, and "Dr. No" was the first film to get me started on that.  The James Bond franchise may be 50 years old now, but "Dr. No" shows the attraction people have to him, and why he still matters to film lovers everywhere.